Why Conflicts Fade from View

TraCe dialogue panel inspires Deborah Feldeisen’s master’s thesis

Why do some intra­state armed conflicts receive sustained media attention, while others dis­appear from the news despite being equally intense? In her master’s thesis, Deborah Feldeisen explored this question. She wrote the thesis as part of the International Studies/Peace and Conflict Re­search master’s program at Goethe University Frank­furt. The idea for the topic emerged as a result of the TraCe dia­logue panel “Darstellungen ex­zessiver Gewalt – zwischen Ver­störung und Attraktion,” (Depictions of Excessive Vio­lence – Between Disturbance and Attrac­tion) which opened the third annual TraCe con­ference on October 30, 2024, in co­operation with the KUNST­HALLE GIESSEN. During the dialogue panel, a member of the audience expressed a desire to stay fully informed about world events through media coverage.. However, topics com­pete for limited media space. Drawing on this ten­sion, Deborah Feldeisen de­veloped her master’s thesis on the un­equal media visibility of con­flicts.

Under the title “Unsicht­bare Kriege, laute Schlagzeilen. Mediale Vernachlässigung von Konflikt­issues,” (Invisible Wars, Loud Head­lines. Media Neglect of Conflict Issues) she investigated whether the goals publicly arti­culated by rebel groups are related to the extent of media coverage of intra-state armed conflicts. Using quanti­tative data analysis, she analyzed coverage in Frank­furter Allgemeine Zeitung and Süd­deutsche Zeitung from 2013 to 2017. Her analysis re­vealed that demands for changes to state struc­tures and for political rights are asso­ciated with a higher expected level of coverage. In contrast, terri­torial and resource-related issues corre­late with lower levels of coverage. 

The thesis discusses the varying journalistic accessi­blity of these topics as possible explanations. Demands for regime change or for poli­tical rights can often be more easily linked to well-known actors, clear lines of con­flict, and normative questions. Local terri­torial claims or complex distributional issues, on the other, often re­quire more explanation and are harder to visualize. The thesis wars super­vised by Constantin Ruhe and Stefan Kroll, and re­ceived the highest grade.